VehicleVerdict

1992 Ford Probe problems

Verdict · NHTSA data

A typical year for this model

The 1992 Ford Probe sits mid-pack among Probe years: 101 NHTSA complaints against a model median of roughly 102, with 3 recalls and 2 closed investigations. Reports tied to this model year include one death and 1 injuries, per the complaint records themselves.

The trouble concentrates in one system: seat belts issues account for 56% of all reports (57 of 101), far ahead of electrical system at 11.

101

NHTSA complaints

3

Recalls

2

Investigations

4

Crash-involved

3

Fires reported

1

Injuries

1

Deaths

NCAP overall

How does 1992 compare to other Probe years?

Probe NHTSA complaints by model year, 1992 highlighted378 complaints1984: 1 complaints1988: 0 complaints1989: 103 complaints1990: 378 complaints1991: 198 complaints1992: 101 complaints1993: 249 complaints1994: 207 complaints1995: 130 complaints1996: 77 complaints1997: 38 complaints1999: 1 complaints
Probe NHTSA complaints by model year, 1992 highlighted. Red bars are years to avoid.

See all Probe years to avoid →

What are the most common 1992 Ford Probe problems?

ComponentComplaintsShare
Seat Belts5756%
Electrical System1111%
Transmission77%
Engine44%
Brakes44%
Tires & Wheels33%
Steering33%
Visibility & Wipers22%
Lighting22%
Suspension22%
Body & Structure11%
Climate Control (A/C & Heat)11%
Other11%
Trailer Hitch11%
Fuel System11%
Speed Control11%

Does the 1992 Ford Probe have recalls?

3 NHTSA recall campaigns on file. Recall repairs are free at franchised dealers.

96V172001Seat BeltsSeptember 6, 1996 · 224,000 units

Defect

NOTE: DRIVER'S SIDE (LEFT) PASSIVE SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY. THE RAIL OF THE AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT CAN WEAR SUFFICIENTLY SUCH THAT THE CABLE WHICH RETRACTS THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY WILL BECOME JAMMED IN THE RAIL RENDERING THE SHOULDER BELT INOPERATIVE.

Consequence

IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT WOULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY RESTRAINED INCREASING THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY.

Remedy

DEALERS WILL REPLACE DRIVER SIDE AND INOPERATIVE PASSENGER SIDE SHOULDER BELT TRACK ASSEMBLIES.

96V172002Seat BeltsSeptember 6, 1996 · 224,000 units

Defect

NOTE: PASSENGER SIDE (RIGHT) SEAT BELT ASSEMBLY. THE RAIL OF THE AUTOMATIC SHOULDER BELT CAN WEAR SUFFICIENTLY SUCH THAT THE CABLE WHICH RETRACTS THE BUCKLE ASSEMBLY WILL BECOME JAMMED IN THE RAIL RENDERING THE SHOULDER BELT INOPERATIVE.

Consequence

IN THE EVENT OF A VEHICLE CRASH, THE OCCUPANT WOULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY RESTRAINED INCREASING THE RISK OF PERSONAL INJURY.

Remedy

DEALERS WILL REPLACE DRIVER SIDE AND INOPERATIVE PASSENGER SIDE SHOULDER BELT TRACK ASSEMBLIES.

93E035000BrakesOctober 13, 1993 · 300 units

Defect

THE GROOVE FOR THE REAR WHEEL BEARING RETAINER RING WAS INCORRECTLY MACHINED.

Consequence

IF THE RETAINING RING DOES NOT SIT CORRECTLY IN THEGROOVE, THE AXLE LUG NUTS WILL BREAK, CAUSING THE BRAKE DRUM, WHEEL, AND TIREASSEMBLY TO SEPARATE FROM THE VEHICLE.

Remedy

MIDAS SHOPS WILL REPLACE THE BRAKE DRUMS WITH OTHER BRAKE DRUMS FROM ANOTHER SUPPLIER.

Consumer complaints filed with NHTSA

Representative excerpts, cleaned of personal information. These are consumer statements, not verified defects.

PASSENGER'S AUTOMATIC SET BELT CAME OUT OF T TRACK AFTER HITTING A DEER. SEAT BELT WAS IN USE AT TIME. PASSENGER WAS THROWN FORWARD WHEN BELT BROKE. HAD NO AIRBAGS. NO INJURIES. *AK

Complaint filed with NHTSA · Seat Belts · crash

TWICE IGNITION SWITCH MODULE STAYED IN ON POSITION, KEEPING/STARTING TO ENGAGE. THIS BURNT WIRES AND OTHER COMPONENTS., RESULTING IN A FIRE. *AK *JB

Complaint filed with NHTSA · Electrical System · October 1, 1993 · fire

THE TRANSMISSION WENT, THE CAR STOPPED AND WANTED TO STALL. HAD TO PUT THE CAR IN NEUTRAL THEN WHEN TAKING OFF HAD TO APPLY A LOT OF GAS FOR IT TO GO, COULD CAUSE A RUNAWAY ACCELERATION PROBLEM. *AK

Complaint filed with NHTSA · Transmission · May 20, 1997

POWER STEERING DOES NOT WORK WITH FAST TURNS, ELECTRIC MIRRORS HAVE FAILED TWICE, FOGGING UP DURING WINTER, PLASTIC TRUNK COVER KEEPS FALLING DOWN. HOOD ALWAYS MAKES VIBRATING NOISE.

Complaint filed with NHTSA · Brakes

THE OIL PAN SEAL WAS REPLACED BY ADAMS FORD IN BELTON MISSOURI TWICE UNDER WARRANTY AND ONCE AFTER THE PART REPLACED WAS OUT OF WARRANTY !!! NOW THE PROBLEM IS BACK AGAIN AFTER JUST A LITTLE OVER A YEAR AND A HALF OF DRIVING!! ADAMS FORD WILL NOT ADMIT THAT THERE IS A PROBLEM AND I BELIEVE THAT 4…

Complaint filed with NHTSA · Engine

1992 Ford Probe — common questions

Is the 1992 Ford Probe reliable?

It is close to typical for the Probe: 101 NHTSA complaints, 3 recalls, and 2 investigations on file.

What are the most common 1992 Probe problems?

According to NHTSA complaint data, the leading problem areas are seat belts (57 complaints), electrical system (11 complaints), transmission (7 complaints).

Does the 1992 Ford Probe have recalls?

Yes — NHTSA lists 3 recall campaigns affecting the 1992 Ford Probe. Recall repairs are free at franchised dealers; check the VIN at nhtsa.gov/recalls to confirm the work was done.

Is the 1992 Ford Probe under NHTSA investigation?

NHTSA opened 2 investigations into this model year; all are now closed.

Which Ford Probe years should you avoid?

Based on complaint rates and open investigations, the Probe years to avoid are 1990, 1993, 1994, 1991. The cleanest record among Probe years belongs to 1988.

Related

Based on NHTSA ODI data through June 2026. Complaints are consumer-reported and unverified. Updated July 5, 2026.

Compiled by Sharon Ben-Moshe, Founder.